Theory of Coconutism

8/26/10

Originally written by: Will Stewart

Edited and amended by: Travis Ford

 

Theory of Coconutism


The Theory of Coconutism is a system of thought centered around maintaining a positive mentality throughout one's daily life, especially when training. One should always believe that he or she is capable of accomplishing any feat of strength or skill that their peers are capable of. The concept of "not strong enough" or "not skilled enough" is a tempting and ready replacement for hard work, but is only relevant to the moment when a challenge is first conceived. Under the stipulations of the Theory of Coconutism, if it is humanly possible, you are encouraged to FIND A WAY TO DO IT.

Etymology:
The term "coconut" is used as a substitution for the word "CAN'T". This is necessary because of participating practitioners who refuse to utter the word, even in recognition of the use of the word or the word itself. Using the word "CAN'T" is often referred to as "dropping a coconut". Hence, the Theory of Coconutism. The concept may be applied to any situation or any form of training, but is heavily rooted in the training of the physical discipline of PARKOUR.

Stipulations and regulations:
  • The main goal is for one to never have the mindset of "CAN'T" and to eradicate the word from the practitioner's vocabulary.
  • In practice, anyone who hears a fellow practitioner say "CAN'T" is in the position to give "prizes" to the one who originally said it.
  • "Prizes" are any increment of physical conditioning based on the experience of the negatively-minded practitioner. For most beginners, "prizes" are commonly 10 standard push-ups. Intermediate or advanced practitioners are subject to more extreme variations of conditioning (i.e. pistol squats, concrete rolls, etc.).
  • "Prizes" are not to be viewed as a punishment, but as a friendly reinforcement of the positive mindset. Upon completion, the appropriate sentiment should be ‘thank you for making me physically and mentally stronger’.
  • Based on the one's involvement in either enforcing or participating, phrases such as "impossible" may be grounds for a "prize". Failure to recognize the name Sebastien Foucan may also result in a hefty "prize".
 
Discuss (12 posts)
Re:Theory of Coconutism
Sep 15 2010 15:24:45
hmm i might try that
#22904
Theory of Coconutism
Oct 12 2010 21:11:05
hrrrrrrrrrmmmmmmm i dont agree with the punishment but what does it matter ive already tested out of this so continue on gentle men
#23222
Re: Theory of Coconutism
Oct 12 2010 22:32:55
History has shown that there is a skim chance of a human learning/changing his way without some sort of "punishment".
#23228
Re: Theory of Coconutism
Oct 19 2010 15:18:35
JohnD. wrote:
History has shown that there is a skim chance of a human learning/changing his way without some sort of "punishment".

This isn't accurate Rewards actually prove to be far better motivators than punishments. Additionally, sporadic incremental rewards produce the highest level of behavior response. Also, it's less negative. No matter how you couch it (calling them "prizes") or try to spin it as a positive (you get stronger! your mindset will be better!) if someone is being asked to do something they don't want to do it will be likely be perceived negatively.

I choose not to participate in this game because all it seems to accomplish is making discourse more difficult. The same is even more true for San Antonio's "mine" variation which, as Joseph illustrated, gets abused just for kicks. But that's just me.
#23271
Re: Theory of Coconutism
Oct 19 2010 15:32:34
Well duh! Haha I don't know where I was going with that...Probably cause previous post stated punishments...

But also it just seems like its how you look at the "prizes" or "punishments".
#23272
There are too many comments to list them all here. See the forum for the full discussion.
You need to login or register to post comments.
Discuss...
activeatx